The idea that the surge is a decided by the commanders on the ground is a myth. President George W. Bush has been repeated, “Will be decided by our commanders on the ground, not by political figures in Washington DC.”
However on December 16, 2006, it was reported, “Strikingly, the surge proposal has not been actively promoted by the top commander in Iraq. General Casey, the Senior American commander in Baghdad, has emphasized faster training of Iraqi security forces, an effort that would be supported in part by converting existing combat forces into trainers,” by David E. Sanger and Michael R. Gordon in G.I.’s to Stabilize Iraq from the New York Times. Also Gen. John P. Abizaid, the top American commander in the Middle East at the time, have made the point that a surge might dissuade Iraqis from doing more to provide for their own security. On the other hand, the “surge” came from a politician that is now running for President. According to the New York Times article (Dec. 16, 2006) reported, “Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, said during a visit to Baghdad this week that American military commanders were discussing the possibility of adding as many as 10 more combat brigades—a maximum of about 35,000 troops—to establish some of control while Iraq’s divided political leaders seek solutions to the mounting violence.” It have been painted in the media that the surge is something that the arm forces put out there; nevertheless, Iraq Study Group rejected the idea of the surge if the order was for 100,000 to 200,000 troops, saying that those levels were not available for a sustained deployment and would feed fears in Iraq that the U.S. was planning a long-term occupation. The arm forces are having trouble recruiting new recruits.
On December 23, 2006 in the Washington Post, the article U.S. commanders in Iraq push troop surge: L.A. Times reported, “Top U.S. military commanders in Iraq have decided to recommend a surge in the number of U.S. combat force there.” However in the same article, Gen. Casey and Gen. Abizaid had opposed boosting U.S. combat troop levels in Iraq, saying that would only heighten opposition to the American presence and reduce pressure on Iraqi leaders to take responsibility for security. I see what the Washington Post is doing here; they know that most people will not real the whole article so they can make it appeal as if Bush is following the lead of the Generals. This idea that Gen Casey and other commanders wanting a surge are false. Both Gen Casey and Gen Abizaid retired in March 2007 after President Bush have decided to increase troops in Iraq. It is a little crazy how the Generals at the time of playing out President Bush commands to increase troops is not around to oversee the progress of the surge throughout the 18 months or so. In the military there is not such thing as firing high ranking personal, but instead they go in early retirement. Also after a general receive his or her second or third star, their rank is all determine by politics.
Now the idea that the “surge is succession” is crazy for there are many factors in the number of deaths going down. For the one the Sunni decided to fight beside the American instead of against to defeat Al-Qaeda. Second, the malicious groups are being pay off by the U.S. arm forces not to fight (for the Iraqis need income so they do what they have to). Third most important, Al-Qaeda have move from Iraq to Afghanistan to reclaim their home land. Now Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki wants for the U.S. forces to leave so they can govern their own country. However, we are heard panic from the Bush Administration on this topic. For the Bush Administration have wanting for American contractors to come in and take over. However, the Iraqis want to run their country by Iraqis standards not American Corporations.
Filed under: politic | Tagged: Baghdad, Commander, Culture, General Casey, Government, Iraq, Iraqi Prime Minister, John McCain, Life, Media, Military, News, Nouri al-Maliki, Politics, President Bush, Surge, Troops | 3 Comments »